PDA

Просмотр полной версии : There are competent opinions?



FLB
01.09.2004, 19:30
The patient, 40 years, the operated carcinoma of a thyroid gland (2002), treatment I-131, remission.



The patient suffers a pollinosis in the form of a ---bronchitis with asthmatic attacks from 20 years. The period June - August



15 years ago desensitizing therapy by small doses of allergens has been spent. Proof remission for 10 years.



Now the pollinosis has returned. At attempt to receive repeated course of treatment, the allergist has declared, that a cancer of a thyroid gland - the strict contraindication.



Question: What in this situation it is more preferable?



1) to find the allergist who does not consider or count it as contraindication? Whether there Are any data about influence of such treatment on oncologic diseases of a thyroid gland?



2) to not treat, and to be rescueed or saved;salvaged klaritinom (helps or assists). But whether there are data about its or his influence on body height of tumours and tp? Whether harmfully to accept it or him 3 months without interruption?



3) to not do or make anything, easier or simply to endure (attacks the strongest) 3 months. But whether weakens or easies it and without that weak immune system?



Voobshchem if someone can tell or say something intelligible in this occasion, - I shall be grateful.

Melnichenko
01.09.2004, 19:30
Any data, podobnymh what are resulted or brought by your allergist, we in the literature did not meet.