Hyperplasia, sites

[Inga_P]

The conclusion on US from 11.2004. A board. The gland is located usually, contours equal, structure or frame non-uniform. In the left share is closer to an isthmus spherical education 0,78 * 0,38 sm and fine gipoehogennye (?) includings or incorporations of 0,3 sm in diameter is defined or determined. The right share: 2,26*1,63*6,25. Left :1,75*1,57*5,34. An isthmus 0,4 see Volume =19,63 sm3. The conclusion: hyperplasia I item the Site of the left share.

at-Ou ?N/ML = 28,1 (norm or rate 34,7 plus-minus 12,9)



From November till June daily accepted -200 on *amp; frac34; tablets. Improvement of structure or frame and volume was expected, but:



The conclusion on US from 06.2005. A board. The gland is located usually, contours equal, structure or frame non-uniform. In the left share - spherical education 0,87 * 0,5 sm and

0,3*0,4 sm in diameter. The right share: 2,28*1,81*6,14. Left :1,76*1,65*5,67. An isthmus 0,3 see Volume =22,22 sm3. The conclusion: hyperplasia I-II item Sites of the left share.



The dear doctor what your references will be? To me 34 years, I live in Saransk. In advance I thank.

[Tanya G]

The dear doctor what your references will be? To me 34 years, I live in Saransk. In advance I thank.

Level TTG?

[Inga_P]

Level TTG?

While there is no result. And 4 it is necessary to hand over?

[Melnichenko]

If TGG deviates norm or rate, from same Serum it (is stored) or kept) will make over 4 (time of definition TTG modern sets 2 hours).

[Inga_P]

Probably, at us unmodern methods - promised result TTG in a week. I hope in a week to inform missing information.

[Inga_P]

I inform result TTG-0,5 (norm or rate: 0,3-3,5). Comment, please.



In addition I inform results from November 2004, i.e. prior to the beginning of treatment *quot; en?aO???*quot;, at the first US:

TTG ??N/ml = 0,6 (norm or rate 0,3-3,5).

at-Ou ?N/ML = 4,5 (norm or rate 34,7 plus-minus 12,9)

[yananshs]

TTG in norm or rate. Sites too small that about them to experience. Antibodies do not need to be investigated or researched more. What was the reason of a direction on US?

Now the control of 0.86 site will be necessary to US. But not so often. Yearly it is quite enough. If its or his size will exceed 1, it or him it will be necessary propunktirovat.

[VanushkoVE]

Punktirovat the site less than 1 sm it is necessary, if is so-called suspitsioznye (suspicious) ultrasonic attributes: gipoehogennyj the site with the central hypervascularization, indistinct edges or territories and mikrokaltsinatami (NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2005).

[Inga_P]

Thanks all for answers. Whether correctly I have understood - really any treatment at present it is not required? But if sites for half a year have grown, they and will grow further?!

Vladimir Eduardovich, your remark, is more exact the link than me has disturbed or alarmed. How to be - in fact US it is made, it not informatively enough?

[Light]

Thanks all for answers. Whether correctly I have understood - really any treatment at present it is not required? But if sites for half a year have grown, they and will grow further?!

Vladimir Eduardovich, your remark, is more exact the link than me has disturbed or alarmed. How to be - in fact US it is made, it not informatively enough?

On your given US-attributes, demanding a puncture biopsy, no.

Any treatment now it is not required, including reception *quot is not necessary also; en?aO??a*quot;.

In 6 months repeat US of a thyroid gland and an. On TTG.

[Inga_P]

Thanks for the answer. But in fact sites for half a year have grown and if nothing to do or make, in half a year vyyrostut still. It turns out - I owe them *quot; oUOa?O?Oy*quot; up to 1 sm?!

[VanushkoVE]

As body height of the site understand change of one of its or his linear sizes not less than on 0,5 sm in time not less half a year.

At you, is raspingly speaking, the site was 0,8 h 0,4 sm, became - 0,9 h 0,5 see Body height is not present. The difference of the sizes speaks about an error of their definition which in the direct image depends on a plane of scanning of the site. The water-melon can be cut lengthways, it is possible across (and it is possible and obliquely). The sizes will be different, the water-melon remains constant.

[Inga_P]

I thank for such accessible explanation! Everything, I calm down or am abirritated on half a year.