Elena
01.08.2004, 21:59
Hello! Your consultation is very necessary.
To my mum 74 years. In 1993 in it or her have found out education in pr. To a share a board. Glands 1, 40, 7.
Results of analyses from 10/II-03: 3 = 1, 1 (norm or rate 1, 0 3, 0), 4 = 105 (norm or rate 53 158), Antibodies to a thyreoglobulin = 300 (norm or rate 0 65)
Results of US from 19/IV-04: Pr. A share 1, 82, 44, 9 sm, a lion. A share 2, 12, 24, 8. An isthmus 0, 7 see Volume: pr. A share 10, 1 sm3, a lion. A share 10, 6 sm3. A parenchyma non-uniform. On the right education 2, 72, 2 sm, in itself is saved a site of non-uniform structure or frame = 1, 40, 7 sm, in the field of an isthmus education 0, 80, 6 see the Conclusion: UZ attributes patholologically changed a board. Glands, nodal education of the right share and an isthmus.
Results of analyses from 22/IV-04: Antibodies to a thyreoglobulin = 50 (norm or rate 0 65)
Results of US from 2/H-04 Pr. A share 2, 02, 24, 2 sm, a lion. A share 1, 82, 04, 7. An isthmus 0, 8 see Volume: pr. A share 9, 2 sm3, a lion. A share 8, 5 sm3. The parenchyma non-uniform due to sites of includings or incorporations low ehogennosti and gipoehogennogo educations 2, 62, 0 see Ehogennost is lowered in pr. To a share. Mobility is saved. The conclusion: UZ attributes of a nodal hyperplasia of a gland.
Results of analyses from 28/H-04 3 = 0, 6 (norm or rate 0, 8 2, 0), 4 = 55 (norm or rate 40 120), TTG = 10, 0 (norm or rate 0, 23 3, 4), Antibodies to a thyreoglobulin = 80 (norm or rate 0, 65), 4 = 10, 0 (norm or rate 8 19)
After last inspection Mercazolilum (or Thiamazolum) has been appointed or nominated.
Advise, whether it is necessary to accept the given preparation at such results of analyses (in fact the volume of education since April has a little decreased and at absence of any treatment)? And in general, what you could recommend in this situation? Whether enough spent inspections? In advance thanks.
To my mum 74 years. In 1993 in it or her have found out education in pr. To a share a board. Glands 1, 40, 7.
Results of analyses from 10/II-03: 3 = 1, 1 (norm or rate 1, 0 3, 0), 4 = 105 (norm or rate 53 158), Antibodies to a thyreoglobulin = 300 (norm or rate 0 65)
Results of US from 19/IV-04: Pr. A share 1, 82, 44, 9 sm, a lion. A share 2, 12, 24, 8. An isthmus 0, 7 see Volume: pr. A share 10, 1 sm3, a lion. A share 10, 6 sm3. A parenchyma non-uniform. On the right education 2, 72, 2 sm, in itself is saved a site of non-uniform structure or frame = 1, 40, 7 sm, in the field of an isthmus education 0, 80, 6 see the Conclusion: UZ attributes patholologically changed a board. Glands, nodal education of the right share and an isthmus.
Results of analyses from 22/IV-04: Antibodies to a thyreoglobulin = 50 (norm or rate 0 65)
Results of US from 2/H-04 Pr. A share 2, 02, 24, 2 sm, a lion. A share 1, 82, 04, 7. An isthmus 0, 8 see Volume: pr. A share 9, 2 sm3, a lion. A share 8, 5 sm3. The parenchyma non-uniform due to sites of includings or incorporations low ehogennosti and gipoehogennogo educations 2, 62, 0 see Ehogennost is lowered in pr. To a share. Mobility is saved. The conclusion: UZ attributes of a nodal hyperplasia of a gland.
Results of analyses from 28/H-04 3 = 0, 6 (norm or rate 0, 8 2, 0), 4 = 55 (norm or rate 40 120), TTG = 10, 0 (norm or rate 0, 23 3, 4), Antibodies to a thyreoglobulin = 80 (norm or rate 0, 65), 4 = 10, 0 (norm or rate 8 19)
After last inspection Mercazolilum (or Thiamazolum) has been appointed or nominated.
Advise, whether it is necessary to accept the given preparation at such results of analyses (in fact the volume of education since April has a little decreased and at absence of any treatment)? And in general, what you could recommend in this situation? Whether enough spent inspections? In advance thanks.