Denis
17.09.2004, 14:39
It can be a little bit chaotic, but a problem in the following: on 2 and 3 m a tooth on the right above (t. e. A forward teeth the canine) had an old seal. At excision of an odontolith it or her have similar disturbed (according to the doctor - hodunom goes ). Yesterday 2 j the tooth has simply broken (has remained 1/3). Today descended or went in an out-patient department and have suggested to put ceramic-metal koronku on 2 j a tooth, and next (there with a seal too it is not strongly good) "narostit" a tooth on an anchor. Have sent on a roentgen and he like as has shown inflammatory process (on a roentgen it looks or appears as dark area at the extremity or end of a root of a tooth in diameter 1, 5 2 mm on 3 m a tooth and 2 2, 5 mm on 2. When the doctor has seen such has told or said, that it is necessary to delete 2 and 3 tooth completely and to put the bridge. The reason of an inflammation as she said that the material in the channel (a seal old - Soviet) has collapsed. To me, chesto speaking to delete a teeth (roots at them normal are a doctor recognizes) at all hunting. Has asked, whether there is a way of medicamental putting off or taking out of an inflammation, etc. Have suggested to put a time or temporary seal with a calcium for a month, but guarantees any do not give. Thus vrach-the orthopedist insists on excision and the equipments or installations of the bridge, and two vracha-speak the stomatologist that it is possible to try to treat, make a seal under koronku and to put koronku on 2 j a tooth, and on 3 j to increase on anekere. How you consider or count, whether it is possible to try to treat a tooth and what actions for this purpose necessary to make (a seal with a calcium, tablets, etc.)? And whether has sense to put koronku on 2 j a tooth. The doctor speaks, that is necessary, t. To. If "narostit" that the tooth will be very fragile (but on 3 j the tooth narostit offers)