Doctor Isaev, respond, please, to this ESSENTIALLY IMPORTANT question! ...

[Oleg]

Doctor Isaev, respond, please, to this ESSENTIALLY IMPORTANT question!
On one of sites I have read through about efficiency of use of condoms as contraceptives. http: / / medicinform. net/contr/cont_met4_1. htm here the citation from it or her: Contraceptive efficiency. At once it is necessary to specify low contraceptive efficiency of condoms. According to the World Organization of Public health services, she makes 12, 5 20 beremennostej on 100 women in a year (for comparison: contraceptive efficiency of the combined contraceptive tablets makes 0 1 pregnancy on 100 women in a year, and endometrial agents - 2 3), t. e. It is obvious, that a condom - not the most reliable way of preservation from undesirable pregnancy. I do not understand the extremity or end of the citation, if probability of break of a condom 1 : 150 - 1 : 300 that whence have undertaken 12, 5 - 20 beremennostej on 100 sluchev uses of condoms. How the spermatozoon can get in a vagina differently, than in consequence or investigation of break of a condom. And on the other hand a condom name good protection against venereal diseases. It turns out, that chances at a spermatozoon to impregnate an ootid on the order above, than at a virus to infect the partner (in the same situations). Whether It is possible to trust information from this clause or article? Thankful in advance for the answer.

[The anonym]

It is possible to trust any information in occasion of breaks of condoms. We with the husband so tried or tasted the whole month, any breaks have not noticed, in _!

[Ariadna]

Oleg, in a condom is so-called pores which diameter is comparable to diameter spermatozojda, it means, that at activity spermatozojdov above an average, they have ability "to filter" through walls of a condom with corresponding or meeting consequences. I do not speak that frequently after the passionate certificate or act of love the condom remains in a vagina after extraction of a penis! What to do or make? In "dangerous" days of month to use spermitsidy alongside with a condom for the raised or increased protection:) Success!

[Isaev D.D.]

Dear Oleg! Researches show, that at correct use of qualitative condoms their efficiency makes 97 98 % Certainly, hormonal contraceptives or endometrial agents in a real life appear more effective, but, unfortunately, in occasion of condoms still it is a lot of prejudices Qualitative condoms do not pass or miss not only spermatozoons, but also large viruses (like a virus AIDS) for what they pass or take place electron testing for the sizes of micropores (the corresponding or meeting indicating are on packing)

[child]

FROM whom pregnancy!? We are married soon as 10 years. And condoms were vsgda a unique protective agent. Only when have wanted rebyonka-lived openly. And now again unique zashchita-condoms. And passionate certificates or acts of love - rather often! And "filter" only at absence of this or it (pr-VA).