Whether the truth that at high and thin muzhiks a member small? Whether there Is at whom a sign...

[Masha]

Whether the truth that at high and thin muzhiks a member small? Whether there Are at whom friends and as they in bed, at me are prospect of the lover wish to learn or find out that expects me.

[SK]

Never believe " national signs ".

[Lima Vajkule]

Recently Isaev wrote about the sexual constitution, look. The short was that at low she is stronger. But it not about members... As a whole, my modest experience poddtverzhdaet, that low and strong guys both are more hardy, and more inventive. But, probably, this business of taste.

[Masha Masha]

How much or As far as I can judge, this sign is not valid.

[***]

Lie. And high, thin can have " ogo-go ", but I agree with Lima, with " korotyshkami-krepyshkami ", as a rule, in bed it is more interesting. But it is my personal experience.

[Vasek]

Well you vashche the maid?!! Dissolute naked babenka. CHo you so excites??? You should give pleasure to him!! Therefore what difference what member at it or him???

[Zjuka]

Saw 11 at 160 sm on body height and 21 at 180 see So a myth it, that small to a root go! What itself, it is those and there!