Dryomov
18.06.2005, 17:03
Dr. Vel, closely or attentively esteemed that you write about a psychotherapy, psychotherapists, patients of psychotherapists and, not wishing to trouble with citations present, would like to state the point of view, to hear your reaction to it or her and to ask a question.
Background of a question.
I am engaged in individual "is art-technical" activity which fetuses are the services necessary for a part of the population, kakovye to her I and realize. I do not require an estimation of a circle of consumers of my services of a product of my creativity, but I am compelled or forced to communicate with them moderately that, how much or as far as they are necessary for me, as a source for continuation of my closed functioning. I do not deny a society, I shall make bold to tell or say, that I am able and sometimes I like to communicate with people, but I can not tell or say, that me pleases, when those emotions and problems interfere with my small society, which these people bring with themselves, addressing to me, as to the supplier of the service necessary to them. It diko oppresses me and irritates. Beginning or starting from depresii and finishing or stopping involuntary and pointless aggression
Under two different your theses the patient of the psychotherapist or object above which a certain psychotherapeutic action is made, or the subject in itself participating.
In the first case.
The psychotherapist not the guru, not the sample for imitation, not the God. In it or him it is not necessary to believe, it or he does not need to be copied and it is not necessary studies at it or him.
However, if to not believe in the doctor, or we shall not tell or say more - to trust the doctor, on what basis as object, I should entrust him directively to put in my head its or his system of the attitude or relation to a society (in its or his all variety!) and to problems, in my attitudes or relations with this society in all this variety existing?
In the second case. Why I should grow constantly as the patient? ( the effect develops gradually, in process of BODY HEIGHT of UNDERSTANDING of by the patient ) In my opinion, the purpose of a psychotherapy decrease of my importance as patient (at least, in relation to a society is:)). Or I should play continuously game which is called I normal in normal situations and I behave as normal if all is normal and if all is not normal - I am able "to beat off", how you during a psychotherapy have learned me to that?
And if all is not normal: if I do not have social medium or mediums where I could realize those role equipments or installations (let even correct!) which the doctor in me has enclosed?
And if I am not a member of any of societies, except for one small - family, where role games izlishni? And besides, I do not aspire to adjoin one of them at all.
Really the psychotherapy is capable to adapt only, sufficiently obolvanit my person that I could sufficiently beskonfliktno function in societies alien to me? Is not present?
I hope, that has not gone too far in philosophizing. Therefore, immediately question: whether the psychotherapist, ITSELF BEING the SUBJECT, and as you write, not always healthy can:) (well, that's nothing unusual!:)) to give other subject, i.e. the patient, an objective picture with it or him of an event and objective methods of an estimation of the situations, authentically reflecting an event, data to the patient - in subjective it or him, the patient, a diffraction.
Once again I ask - if it has turned out too "abstrusely", is an impression it is deceptive!!! The answer or advice or council I ask to give as much as possible simple and in the accessible form:))
The dock, I is capable to reach you in exclusively disgusting mood, but here I do not know, - whether it is necessary to me to do or make it???
Dryomov
Background of a question.
I am engaged in individual "is art-technical" activity which fetuses are the services necessary for a part of the population, kakovye to her I and realize. I do not require an estimation of a circle of consumers of my services of a product of my creativity, but I am compelled or forced to communicate with them moderately that, how much or as far as they are necessary for me, as a source for continuation of my closed functioning. I do not deny a society, I shall make bold to tell or say, that I am able and sometimes I like to communicate with people, but I can not tell or say, that me pleases, when those emotions and problems interfere with my small society, which these people bring with themselves, addressing to me, as to the supplier of the service necessary to them. It diko oppresses me and irritates. Beginning or starting from depresii and finishing or stopping involuntary and pointless aggression
Under two different your theses the patient of the psychotherapist or object above which a certain psychotherapeutic action is made, or the subject in itself participating.
In the first case.
The psychotherapist not the guru, not the sample for imitation, not the God. In it or him it is not necessary to believe, it or he does not need to be copied and it is not necessary studies at it or him.
However, if to not believe in the doctor, or we shall not tell or say more - to trust the doctor, on what basis as object, I should entrust him directively to put in my head its or his system of the attitude or relation to a society (in its or his all variety!) and to problems, in my attitudes or relations with this society in all this variety existing?
In the second case. Why I should grow constantly as the patient? ( the effect develops gradually, in process of BODY HEIGHT of UNDERSTANDING of by the patient ) In my opinion, the purpose of a psychotherapy decrease of my importance as patient (at least, in relation to a society is:)). Or I should play continuously game which is called I normal in normal situations and I behave as normal if all is normal and if all is not normal - I am able "to beat off", how you during a psychotherapy have learned me to that?
And if all is not normal: if I do not have social medium or mediums where I could realize those role equipments or installations (let even correct!) which the doctor in me has enclosed?
And if I am not a member of any of societies, except for one small - family, where role games izlishni? And besides, I do not aspire to adjoin one of them at all.
Really the psychotherapy is capable to adapt only, sufficiently obolvanit my person that I could sufficiently beskonfliktno function in societies alien to me? Is not present?
I hope, that has not gone too far in philosophizing. Therefore, immediately question: whether the psychotherapist, ITSELF BEING the SUBJECT, and as you write, not always healthy can:) (well, that's nothing unusual!:)) to give other subject, i.e. the patient, an objective picture with it or him of an event and objective methods of an estimation of the situations, authentically reflecting an event, data to the patient - in subjective it or him, the patient, a diffraction.
Once again I ask - if it has turned out too "abstrusely", is an impression it is deceptive!!! The answer or advice or council I ask to give as much as possible simple and in the accessible form:))
The dock, I is capable to reach you in exclusively disgusting mood, but here I do not know, - whether it is necessary to me to do or make it???
Dryomov