As you consider or count, since what salary (after the termination or ending of institute) a trace...

[It is lovely]

How you consider or count, since what salary (after the termination or ending of institute) it is necessary "to be killed" at job?

[Tier]

As a rule, conscientiousness does not depend on the salary)

[The censor]

If right after the terminations or endings of institute first of all to think it is necessary about prospects and professional body height. And when year you will work, you will become the expert it is already possible and to talk about the salary. Naturally and with famine to die it is not necessary and it is necessary to have any living wage (well if at once and a maximum). And this minimum (maximum) everywhere raznyj-in Moscow one, in Uryupinsk another.

[The plowman]

It completely agree with the censor prove to be work practically establish or install communications or connections and acquaintances and then already and a head twist.

[It is lovely]

In Moscow. And year has already passed or has already taken place. And conscientiousness at me just much (it is bad to praise itself, but it so).

[VBD]

Diligence of the subordinate does not depend in any way on the size of the salary. By my personal experience of the principal I know, that if the person not diligent - as encourage, all the same will be a little.

[It is lovely]

I work in the Japanese firm, and Japanese, as is known, the most exacting principals. More hardly, only korejtsy.
Sometimes it is a pity to me, that we do not have rubber Japanese on whom it is possible to knock as in Tokyo. Very much there is no such toy.

[Huch]

It is better to be less loaded for a smaller payment.
My friend working the bookkeeper at 5 enterprises, has dried up as plum for last years, hardly legs or foots drags. I do not know, whether this earned money for treatment will suffice her.

[Kajfman]

It seems to me - the answer in your question - to be killed at job for the salary it is not necessary