Girls, greetings. Very interestingly your opinion. If your young man bere...

[___]

Girls, greetings. Very interestingly your opinion. If your young man takes from you money for one thing which he to you under your request has bought or purchased, it as, normally? The sum simply ridiculous - is less than 500 roubles. You would take offence?

[Natalia]

To take offence early, but on a note to take it is necessary.

[Vick]

I would not take offence, but it would be small zvonochek to look narrowly at it or him;them more closely or attentively. If only he not the unemployed or with z/pl 200 dollars

[Elena]

Mda... It shows far not its or his best qualities. But it not an occasion for quarrel, simply take this episode to itself on a note.

[neangel!]

If he has bought or purchased a thing under your request for own money. He should know, that has bought or purchased a thing for the money. And to not demand from the girl of return. If he has taken in a duty or debt and would return shortly back, this another matter. Though I do not like, when guys take from me in a duty or debt and consequently it occurs or happens very seldom.

[TO.]

It seems to me is normal. I before wedding if asked the groom something to buy or purchase to me, always at once gave money. Even a trifle: Aspirinum, the container for lenses, etc. If he to me bought something or invited: theater tickets, flowers, gifts, clubs, etc., that, naturally, on the agents. Thus I felt more confidently with it or him. After wedding at us, naturally, the general or common budget.

[Lerchik]

I would become thoughtfull, and then would talk to it or him. Sometimes women hurry up with conclusions, seeing in such acts display of greed of the man. When I met with the second (then still the future) the husband, we with it or him had a small misunderstanding on a subject of money. Sometimes I leaved from it or him late, the underground any more did not work. Machines or cars at it or him are not present to bring up me up to the house, and to go decently. He saw off me up to highway, then we caught a wheelbarrow, said goodbye, I reached the house and... Paid off itself. More shortly, felt full idiotkoj. I have decided to not wind myself and to talk to it or him. It has appeared, that he simply hesitated to suggest to pay to me for the machine or car, afraid, that I shall think, as if he "buys" me, and ja-that saw in it or this only an element of caring. We have each other understood, and I any more did not pay for the machine or car. Probably, someone will reproach me with commercialism, but it seems to me quite normal phenomenon, that the man should spend the woman up to the house and if it or he does not have opportunity to make it most, he any other way out means should find.

[The anonym]

___, and you whom means, your husband, or other "yours" MCH?

[stasja]

Itself asked, itself pay, what for to strain the person!
Ridiculous or not the sum.

[The anonym]

It completely agree with Stasej and To. And if he has asked? You from it or him too would not take money?

[___]

Anonymous jazvochka, fortunately, such "treasure" passed me. He/she is mine MCH, podruzhkin. Now he already "was" or "former". It seems to me, what exactly here such trifles very well characterize the person. And would wash the husband never so has not made. I money, certainly, have offered politeness and decencies for the sake of, but he never would take. This hairsplitting any.

[Vick]

By the way, about the man "buys". At me was by an early youth kompleks-nekompleks in occasion of "buys". Type I such all independent as though to that that wished that to prove that, for myself everywhere cry or pay and so on. And my good friend who it or this enraged, me as that on my phrase from a series you "buy" has cheerfully blurted out " Vau, vikusja, and I and did not know, that you so cheaply cost or stand "..))
In my environment muzhiks pay (if is money), is simple because they men because it is their status. It is impossible to buy or purchase that is not on sale. And if the man to concern to you as to the investment send at once on Tver, the fixed rate and without risk there is in advance known, that money will be gone.

[Lerchik]

I agree with last report Vicks. Especially I liked the answer of its or her friend:)) it is good, that he with humour has concerned to this situation. Frequently people simply do not know how to react to similar applications or statements, here and in the further are afraid to offend the person as it was in my case.

[___]

To the anonym from May, 14th 2004 15 : 29 : 26. I respond: I would not take money. But it seems to me, to offer them each decent person should give. Well the muzhik should not take money from the girl, this my belief.

[ksy]

All zavmsmt from affinity of attitudes or relations to mine. When live together is one, or to get married are going to in the near future, that finance consider or examine;survey as the general or common. And if people so to say separately independent, simply meet, I do not see well anything such in that that he of money has taken. To mine at all the certificate of greed, and more likely an attribute of that that this muzhik of money for a wind will not throw it (the truth obviously he as the future shows that the girlfriend to the spouse not rassmairmvaet while)... Though should make the amendment to Russia, there it was always accepted that iuzhchiny money littered. Neither in the Europe, nor in America it is not accepted and the given situation salas sovenshenno normal

[The anonym]

As it is good, that we not in the Europe or America

[ksy]

And whence such potreitelskoe the attitude or relation to men?

[8888]

All depends from education both. It is normal, certainly to give money. But if the woman is brought up so, that the man contains it or her, should not be zhvdnym in mind or wit she will draw to him the big minus if he will accept this money. It as the proof of generosity, courage chtoli. Here business not in quantity or amount and in the fact, let there though copeck, but she sposbna "to substitute" the man)))

[The anonym]

And why actually he should pay for YOU? In the extremity or end that of the extremities or ends when already to change this desire of a freebie, he nothing should you, and you to him. Not be such materialistkoj. You here shout only 500 r. The-sum scanty, and can at it or him only and remains 500 r. Up to the salary, or debts or still that.

[Failure or Accident]

If you consist in attitudes or relations for the girl such step from parnja-is simply humiliating.

[Iriska]

Why men should pay for us? Esteem once again the report Vicks. It is normal! An another matter if crisis with money then it is quite possible to understand its or his position, I understand it. I here whom would not meet, in such situation did not get, if I asked the man something to buy or purchase, variants was two - the first: certainly, already to run and then govoriit there is nothing, the second: excuse, I am glad, but money at me is not present, then it becomes already clear, that here such situevina...

[Solo]

It would be unpleasant to me. Business not in money, and concerning. Nikokogo the consumer attitude or relation to men at women is not present, it or this in general is not present in Russia. - to my opinion, it is an attribute of usual greed, and undisguised. I pozhruzhkam give the gifts, I treat in cafe (I am a woman), I treat muzhchin-friends, and never I ask them to return to me of money. When I see, that the man with pleasure accepts my gestures, seldom responds the counter invitation - he for me "dies" as the man, there are only business relations. It is confident, that the person is shown in trifles. And very much it would be desirable to add, dear girls, think, why we should be arranged, forgive under them. Eventually if on that has gone - THEY SHOULD FEED us, And we FOR IT TO LIKE THEM and all.

[___]

The anonym from May, 16th 2004 16 : 55 : 14. You have understood nothing. Has put at all in a freebie and not in the consumer attitude or relation to men. Such acts och. Well show human qualities. By the way, I to this history of the attitude or relation have no, it was interesting to learn or find out "public opinion" on this bill. Your charges in materialism not to me.