PDA

Просмотр полной версии : To my son 3, 5 months Okr. Heads 42 see. A fontanel 1, 51, 5, a tremor under...



Alexander
10.07.2004, 16:41
To my son 3, 5 months Okr. Heads 42 see. A fontanel 1, 51, 5, a tremor of a chin at a load, spontaneous r. moro with a delay in 1 phase, spontaneous grefe, distonichnyj a muscle tone, distal (?) Hyperhidrosis. Other parameters in norm or rate. The child in the afternoon a restless, exacting, night dream of 5 6 hours without interruption + 2 3 hours after feeding. Development corresponds or meets to age. Was born in time, apgar 7/8, attributes morfofunktsionalnoj dismaturities. Results NSG: Structures or Frames horoho are differentiated, symmetric. The drawing of sulcuses and gyruses "will emphasize". Expansions of tanks subrahnoidalnogo are not present space. mezhbolusharnaja a cleft or rima at a level of frontal lobes of 6 mm, parietal or bregma shares of 4 mm, occipital shares of 6 mm. On konvekstialnoj surfaces in podobolochechnom space anehogennaja a stria of 5 6 mm. Lateralnye ventricles: forward rogra D = 4 mm, S = 6, bodies D = 3 mm, S = 7 mm, occipital horns D = 12 mm, S = 15, 3, 4 ventricles up to 3 mm, are not expanded. Dop. A stalemate. Includings or incorporations are not present, periventikuljarnye tissues and areas of basal ganglions usual ehogennosti, soud. Plexuses are not expanded, parameters of a hemodynamic are not broken or disturbed. Index of a resistance in pool of a forward cerebral artery 0, 654, a flow rate in vein Galena 13, 2 sm/with. The conclusion: a clump of a liquid in podobolochechnom space, azygomorphous expansion left lateralnogo a ventricle.
On the basis of all aforesaid the neurologist diagnoses: PEP, SPNRV, gipertenzionno-gidrotsefalnyj a syndrome in a stage of subindemnification, SMD. Purposes or appointments for 1 month Triampur compositum 1/4 in day under the scheme or plan + ++-, Cavintonum 0, 005 1/8 t. h 2 r. In day, Fenobarbitalum 0, 005 + Ca gluc 1 items for the night.
Please, comment on the diagnosis and purposes or appointments. Whether really the child requires medicamental treatment (especially confuses Triampur compositum and Fenobarbitalum. In advance I thank for the help and comprehension.

Nogovitsyn V.J.
10.07.2004, 21:35
Doubts are proved. Possibly, in the foreground here morfo-the functional dismaturity (she also is specified in the text) and to treat it or her is useless. Data of inspections do not give representation about character of problems at the child, in similar cases high-grade neurologic survey is necessary, and in absentia he is impossible.

Alexander
12.07.2004, 11:39
Many thanks.