Hello! At the son (1 month) a link sided cryptorchism. Today have gone or send to e...

[Olga]

Hello! At the son (1 month) a link sided cryptorchism. Today have gone or send to the endocrinologist in children's consultation, such starushka-the endocrinologist there sits, has told or said to us: " well, that it is necessary to operate, probably. Treatment till two years it is not spent, it is senseless. Though can and the testicle will lower or omit so still.. (it is directly at an input or entrance in mashonku). But I wish to tell or say to you, pampers are better for not wearing. All property in this pampers there heats up. Better pelenochku, kleenochku, and from pamperssov one harm! "
Here we also are puzzled, whether is valid so?? Or all taki in her speaks an old age??? neznaem, whether to refuse pampers????

[Krivskaja L.K.]

Zdravsvujte! Official data about that, what is it harmfully, no. But, on logic of things, temperature of tissues above in a pampers. In your case it is more significant, t. To. The testicle and without that is now not in the best conditions and the additional overheating for it or him is not so good. Certainly, it is not necessary so all at once to throw and pass on diapers. Walk in pampers, and here houses try to hold the child without them. This most optimum.