Andrey
19.06.2004, 20:10
Hello the doctor. We already addressed to you. Many thanks for answers. I here still that have recollected. To the child in 2 and in 4. Did or made US of a head. I result or bring last result, t. To. They are similar. Structures or frames a goal. A brain raspolozh. Correctly. Lateral zhel-ki are not expanded. Left 1 = D the Forward horn at the left 0, 3 sm, on the right 0, 3. Vascular plexuses a side. zhelud-kov are symmetric, neizmeneny 1 = D. 3 j, 4 j zhel-ki are not expanded. The Cavity of the septum pellucidum is closed. M-the echo is expanded 0, 5. podobolochnoe the space is expanded symmetrically from both parties or sides up to 0, 23. Ehogennost a goal. A brain it is saved. Focal changes: a fibrosis on a course of striatal arteries from both parties or sides linear and V the figurative form. Prompt please. Whether that this fibrosis could kak-to affect or influence occurrence at the child of an epileptic syndrome or it completely not the things not interconnected with each other? Whether it is dangerous obnaruzhenyj a fibrosis to health of the child? Whether it is necessary also it or him for us kak-that it to treat? Our doctor kak-that has easy concerned to such conclusion of US. The only thing that we then did or made it drank or saw nemotan and Diacarbum (but it like as iz-for hydrocephaluses). And more, I cannot forget all diagnosed "episindrom". But tell or say, whether there are errors in EEG, considering, that the child slept badly, superficially, often woke up. And in 6 months 3 4 days prior to ORZ and accordingly up to first "attack" the child has fallen from a sofa. But it was not high, about 40 sm there was no even an ecchymosis. Whether falling sprovatsirovat occurrence episindroma could? Excuse me for such big question.