Investigating or Researching sites of ophthalmologic clinics for disposal of a glaucoma...

[Stas (a question on a glaucoma)]

Investigating or Researching sites of ophthalmologic clinics for disposal of a glaucoma, I have drawn such conclusions:
1. Owners of the laser equipments or installations speak all, that drops treat not a glaucoma, and its or her consequences, and it is necessary to do or make operation.
2. The prices at all considerably different, and lasers at all LASIK (I did not consider or examine;survey older), t. e. Identical. Therefore there is no difference in what clinic to do or make glaukomatoznuju operation.

QUESTION: whether such conclusions are correct? If is not present, why?
Thanks!

[The anonym]

As a rule, all over again treatment begin drops and if it does not help or assist offer operation. Lasik - the laser not for treatment of a glaucoma and for correction of vision. Find clinic and to which you trust the expert.

[Sachkova O.J.]

Kapli-this first agent of a choice for treatment of a glaucoma, they practically have no side effects and effectively enough reduce VGD. To the laser the attitude or relation ambiguous. Laser treatment of a glaucoma effectively only in initial stages of a glaucoma, also gives effect far not at all patients, often effect temporary. After a laser intervention to operate a glaucoma is much more serious, t. To. After the laser solderings and neogenic vessels inside of an eye that conducts to operational complications are always formed, including and at surgery of a cataract in the future (if it is required). To surgery of a glaucoma (in t. ch and) very strict indications, and glavnoe-otsutsvie normalization VGD on drops (and their choice now is very wide) should be laser