Oleg Sychev
09.07.2003, 16:50
Who can prompt me intelligibly, whether it is necessary to delete a tattoo by means of holodnoplazmennogo coagulator. Manufacturers approve or confirm, that scars after such excision will not be. The cosmetic clinics applying other ways of excision tatu (different kinds of lasers, the radiocoagulators, decolouring or decolorizing structures, a grinding of a skin) too approve or confirm all, that scars after their procedures does not remain. However, all these ways listed in brackets, leave rather appreciable scars. Itself saw. And on the Internet the information gradually began to appear, that excision of a tattoo by the laser inevitably entails scars. I do not speak about grinding a skin... So to that to believe? Someone has already tried or tasted on itself this most holodnoplazmennyj coagulator? On their site like all it is beautifully painted. But also on any other site too all is very well advertised or promoted... The low price, only 10 USD for square centimeter Surprises. Laser clinics take up to 30 USD. Or all over again declare or announce the price in 200 roubles, but after the first session it appears, that it is necessary to pass or take place still a minimum two sessions.
Prompt something efficient on this question, and that to me here job pristizhnaja shines, and with a tattoo - do not take.
Prompt something efficient on this question, and that to me here job pristizhnaja shines, and with a tattoo - do not take.