US in 32 weeks

[JAnochka]

Comment, please, on results of US in 32 weeks: BPR 8.35. Sm, a circle of a head of 30.3 sm, the frontooccipital size of 10.1 sm, dl. bedren. Bones (and right and left) on 6.2 sm, length of an anticnemion right and left on 5,6, length of a humeral bone right and left on 5,5 sm, length of bones of a forearm right and left on 5,2 sm, diameter of a stomach or belly of 8,5 sm, a circle of a stomach or belly of 27,4 sm, the sizes of a fetus correspond or meet to 33 weeks, lateral ventricles are not expanded, the greater or big tank is not expanded, a cerebellum (PDM) 3. 8 sm that corresponds or meets to a duration of gestation, 4 h a chamber section of heart are visualized, orbits are not changed, lungs are visualized, the stomach is visualized, kidneys and the bladder is visualized, a place of an attachment of a cord or navel to a forward abdominal wall usual, the placenta is located on a back wall, in a uterine fundus, more on the right, structure or frame of a placenta with dense fine signals, thickness of a placenta of 3,4 sm, stepe maturities 1 that there corresponds or meets to term in 33 weeks, weight of a fetus 2000 - 2250 g, the cord or navel has 3 vessels, an index of an amnionic liquid 5,6. The conclusion - pregnancy of 32-33 weeks. Whether normal it is parameters of US, if actually at me term of 32 weeks? Whether also normal weight of the child for this term?

[mariamm]

Your term and the conclusion uzi completely correspond or meet each other - 32-33 weeks (term is always put so, instead of one week. 32 weeks and 1 day are 32-33 weeks.) in what your question? In the conclusion after each data set it is written - norm or rate for such term. And this term - yours.