Obstruction of uterine pipes

[taucua]

Good afternoon. In August, 2004 to me spent UZ GSG and have diagnosed an obstruction of the right uterine pipe on border intamuralnogo and an intersticial or interstitial department. The left pipe and an ovary has been removed 7 years ago (operation in occasion of a torsion of an oothecoma). 2 decisions are recommended.
1. GS and a balloon dilatation of the right uterine pipe.
2. EKO.
In clinic which can do or make a laparoscopy, recommend the first decision. The clinic which specializes on EKO insists on EKO, and a laparoscopy names " waste of money and time ". Help or assist to understand what to prefer. Whether it is necessary to go at once on EKO or to try to restore permeability of a pipe?:confused:
To me 25, beremennostej was not. I live in Novosibirsk.

[mariamm]

uzi - a doubtful way of diagnostics of permeability of a pipe.
It is necessary or to go at once on EKO, or all over again on a laparoscopy - all can not so badly or permeability can be restored. Not balonnoj a dilatation certainly. And laparoskopicheskim separation of solderings - suddenly they all the same not there. But if the diagnosis will prove to be true - only EKO