Hi-Hi
01.09.2004, 19:30
Dear doctors! Very much I ask to place in the places two various among themselves opinions, if mozhno-argumentirovanno.
Procedure of check of permeability of uterine pipes is necessary to me. Until recently for this purpose it was used GSG at which permeability look by means of a roentgen. However last time the increasing popularity and prevalence receives method ESG where X-rays are replaced by less harmful US. I am between two fires. One my doctor, and many girls who have been last through it speak, that ESG is less morbid (the risk of a spastic stricture of pipes because of a pain that reduces risk of the incorrect diagnosis decreases), plus does not occur or happen an irradiation of ovaries (though I do not think, that there such and a strong exposure dose, and preservation in this cycle like anybody yet did not cancel), and the picture turns out at all the worst quality. However other doctor approves or confirms, that GSG is more informative, and I nevertheless reflect, ch that if ESG would be as is reliable, but thus is deprived some unpleasant moments in comparison with GSG last already probably would refuse.
Vsvjazi with it or this at me a question to you. Explain please than so these two ways and if it is valid ESG essentially differ is less informative - that why?:confused: What influences an end result of research?:confused:
At once I wish to make a reservation: about a laparoscopy though also diagnostic, speeches do not go yet. Though I know, that this method of check of pipes - the most reliable but while are considered or examined;surveyed ESG and GSG.
In advance I thank for the answer.
Procedure of check of permeability of uterine pipes is necessary to me. Until recently for this purpose it was used GSG at which permeability look by means of a roentgen. However last time the increasing popularity and prevalence receives method ESG where X-rays are replaced by less harmful US. I am between two fires. One my doctor, and many girls who have been last through it speak, that ESG is less morbid (the risk of a spastic stricture of pipes because of a pain that reduces risk of the incorrect diagnosis decreases), plus does not occur or happen an irradiation of ovaries (though I do not think, that there such and a strong exposure dose, and preservation in this cycle like anybody yet did not cancel), and the picture turns out at all the worst quality. However other doctor approves or confirms, that GSG is more informative, and I nevertheless reflect, ch that if ESG would be as is reliable, but thus is deprived some unpleasant moments in comparison with GSG last already probably would refuse.
Vsvjazi with it or this at me a question to you. Explain please than so these two ways and if it is valid ESG essentially differ is less informative - that why?:confused: What influences an end result of research?:confused:
At once I wish to make a reservation: about a laparoscopy though also diagnostic, speeches do not go yet. Though I know, that this method of check of pipes - the most reliable but while are considered or examined;surveyed ESG and GSG.
In advance I thank for the answer.