Comment on analyses on hormones, pliz!

[kuka]

Good afternoon!

Comment, please, on results of analyses on hormones.

Handed over for 6 day of a cycle, on November, 27th 2004.

Age of 30 years, nonpregnant, in May 2004. There was not developing pregnancy, last menses very poor or scanty (2 days) and morbid.

About what these results speak?

The doctor up to the extremity or end of year in holiday.

In advance I thank!



Progesteronum - result - 7,0 (ZH.: fol.f. 0,2, ..8-78)

Prolactinum - result - 282, 4 (ZH.: fol.f. 57-600, ljut.f. 120)

ekstradiol - result - 88, 8 (ZH.: ..25-221, ..26-408)

Testosteron-Depotum - result - 0,91 (ZH.: up to 4,6)

LG (ljutropin) - result - 12, 9 (ZH.: fol.f. 2,0, ..0,5 - 17, 0)

FSG (follitropin) - result - 37,7 (ZH.: ..3,0 - 12,0, ..2,0-12,0)

Hydrocortisone - result - 381,4 (140-600, evening - 50-280 ???y/l)

aYa-ZINCI SULFAS - result - 5,1 (ZH.: till 30 years - 0,3 - 7,8, 31-50 years - 0,1)

T 3-free - result-, 6 (1,68-3,54 u/ml)

T 4 free - result - 1,0 (0,71 - 1,85 ng/n?)

TTG (thyrotropin) - result - 3,7 (from 0,3 up to 0,4 ??N/ml)

at-Ou - result - 3,7 (up to 100 ?N/ML)

17- Progesteronum - result 1, 4 (ZH.: fol.f. 0,2-2,4, ljut.f. 0,9-8,7).

[Nastija]

You were mistaken in the indicating of specifications TTG.

[Strij]

Yes, was mistaken.

TTG (thyrotropin) - result 3,7 (from 0,3 up to 4,0 ?/?N/ml).



Professor Melnichenko! What it is possible to draw conclusions by results of analyses on hormones? The diagnosis unfavourable... Therefore you have not commented?!

[NZu1217]

The Lord with you! What diagnosis?

There are no problems with a thyroid gland, in norm or rate Prolactinum, there are no bases to search for dysfunction of a cortex of adrenals.

And the diagnosis he in fact puts treating vrach-something meant. When appointed or nominated these or it o?

[Rum]

Professor Melnichenko! Thanks for the answer! The gynecologist has appointed or nominated these analyses in connection with taken place not developing pregnancy in May 2004.